[Beowulf] ever heard of ScaleMP?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caTue Dec 11 08:59:53 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ever heard of ScaleMP?
- Next message: [Beowulf] ever heard of ScaleMP?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Flextronics was showing a small cluster where they had 4 boxes connected > by IB and within each box they had 4 systems connected by IB. They were > running ScaleMP on it. They had a graph of running Stream on top of the > system. They were plotting bandwidth vs. number of cores and it was fairly > linear (I didn't get a close look at it). but stream is embarassingly parallel, so even if their interconnect was wet string, it should scale perfectly with number of nodes. (well, start and end-of-loop synchronization probably doesn't work well with wet string, but that just means you crank up the array size ;) does anyone know how the coherency actually works? without a full-fledged memory proxy (as SGI has in their NUMAlink machines, or as in the Newisys Horus), it seems like this approach is going to spend a lot of time twiddling the MMU and taking page faults.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] ever heard of ScaleMP?
- Next message: [Beowulf] ever heard of ScaleMP?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
