[Beowulf] specific motherboard???
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caFri Dec 7 17:10:41 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] specific motherboard???
- Next message: [Beowulf] specific motherboard???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> Keep in mind that the Petsc faq mentions: > A fast, low-latency interconnect; any ethernet, even 10 gigE cannot provide > the needed performance. which seems foolish on the face of it, since 10G can be fairly low latency. for instance, Myrinet quotes 2.3 us for mx-over-myrinet on their 10G nic, and 2.63 for mx-over-ethernet (same nic and host, fujitsu eth switch). that's not the lowest latency interconnect, but it's a far cry from 50 us Gb latency... > I wouldn't assume that your workload will scale with gigE to 16 nodes. I haven't scrutinized petsc docs, but I would expect the answer to depend on what you're doing and also how big a chunk you can put onto a single node. standard volume/surface argument. from 10,000 feet, it _looks_ like petsc could be used in a pretty high-work-per-communication manner. > tested DDR3, but all the tests I've seen show minimal performance improvements > at substantial price increases. my understanding is that ddr3-ddr2 changes are largely system-level engineering (lower voltage/power, some changes in signal handling to improve snr and scalability.)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] specific motherboard???
- Next message: [Beowulf] specific motherboard???
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
