[Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at gmail.comFri Dec 7 12:41:37 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Lindahl wrote: > > In real life (i.e. not HPC), everyone uses message passing between > nodes. So I don't see what you're getting at. > Many on this list suggest that using multiple MPI-processes on one and the same node is superior to MT approaches IIUC. However I have the impression that almost the whole industry is looking into MT to benefit from multi-core without even considering message-passing. Why is that so? toon
- Previous message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] multi-threading vs. MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
