[Beowulf] Re: CSharifi Next generation of HPC
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at mcmaster.caMon Dec 3 22:15:00 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS Read Errors
- Next message: [Beowulf] Intel MPI Benchmark maintainers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> C-Sharifi Cluster Engine: The Second Success Story on "Kernel-Level OK, how about providing some meaty content? google shows me that you've put this fairly content-light PR on several groups and websites. > as Usability. Although the latter belief was hard to realize, a sample why was it hard? there have been a fair number of several kernel-based dist-OS approaches (MOSIX comes to mind, but scyld, and also a host of older academic systems.) > byproduct called DIPC was built purely based on this thesis and openly > announced to the Linux community worldwide in 1993. This was admired for > being able to provide necessary supports for distributed communication at > the Kernel Level of Linux for the first time in the world, and for providing page-based distributed shared memory has been done many, many times, and operate in a very easy-to-understand manner (like a cache with 4KB rather than 64KB lines.) can you quantify the advantage to managing the DSM in the kernel? I'm sure you're aware that "playing MMU games" is not highly regarded in many circles because of its slowness - have you figured out a way around that? regards, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] NFS Read Errors
- Next message: [Beowulf] Intel MPI Benchmark maintainers?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
