[Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
richard.walsh at comcast.net richard.walsh at comcast.netMon Dec 3 14:29:56 PST 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-------------- Original message -------------- From: Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:47:41PM +0000, richard.walsh at comcast.net wrote: > > > I think that the number of real-world apps in this class is perhaps > > not large, or there would be more hybrid code. > > Ah, but you've missed the random element here: People start writing > hybrid code before they have any proof that it helps them. Or they > don't write it at all because they know it's complicated. Either way, > you can't assume cause and effect of "hybrid helps me" and "my code > is hybrid". True, enough ... one must consider both the kinetic and thermodynamic requirements for existence, but I was thinking that the system was perhaps at equilibrium by now. Still, it was careless of me to use non-existence to argue for either the absense of cause or presence of impossibility. I am still waiting to get a straight flush in 5-card draw. ;-) rbw -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20071203/ee242292/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Next message: [Beowulf] Using Autoparallel compilers or Multi-Threaded libraries with MPI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
