[Beowulf] Big storage
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bruce Allen ballen at gravity.phys.uwm.eduFri Aug 31 03:26:48 PDT 2007
- Previous message: Fwd: [Beowulf] Configuration change monitoring
- Next message: [Beowulf] a "microwulf" posted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Loic, I'm planning to buy a handful (8 to 16) x4500's a bit later this year, so I am quite interested in the details. > All RAID operations are done in software by ZFS (which acts as both a > filesystem and a volume manager). > > ZFS has a "scrub" command that does a background scan of a pool (a set > of disks), it's not done automatically by default but can be automated > very easily. > > The "scrub" also verifies the parity/checksum of the data blocks. > There is a example of this in one the ZFS demos on the OpenSolaris web > site: <http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/demos/selfheal/>. Nice demo! > The data found to be damaged during a "scrub" is corrected/repaired > (immediatly) using the various parity/checksum/mirror information > available (see the "zpool" man page on the OpenSolaris web site). > > ZFS also has more redundancy than just RAID-5 or RAID-6 (when using > "raidz2" in the latter case), especially in the newer ZFS versions. > The "ditto blocks" for instance, allow you to have multiple copies of > the same data or metadata. In a system with 24 x 500 GB disks, I would like to have usable storage of 20 x 500 GB and use the remaining disks for redundancy. What do you recommend? If I understand correctly I can't boot from ZFS so one or more of the remaining 4 disks might be needed for the OS. > Another nice feature is the "parity check on read" (similar to what DDN > disk controllers do). > > I am not a Sun employee or share holder, we just have many X4500 (soon > more than 100, probably around 130 at the end of the year). > > We've had X4500s in "production" for almost a year and they have > proved to be very reliable, very fast and globally pretty cheap. I have heard similar reports from my collaborators at a few other locations. Cheers, Bruce
- Previous message: Fwd: [Beowulf] Configuration change monitoring
- Next message: [Beowulf] a "microwulf" posted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
