[Beowulf] Big storage
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comFri Aug 24 08:29:49 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Next message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey B. Layton wrote: [...] > "The probability of the disk failing to read back data is the same as > it was long ago, so today you can expect at least one failed read every > 10TB to 100TB. But the reconstruction of a failed 500GB disk in an > 11-disk array has to read 5TB, so there can be an unacceptably large > chance of failure to rebuild every one of the 1 billion sectors on the > failed disk." It gets worse. At some point in capacity, you can no longer assume all disks are operational all the time, reading in an non-error state. Unfortunately for us, this capacity is (as Garth and others have pointed out) really close by. Well within an order of magnitude of the capacity of a single drive. This means it is well within the capacity of a standard RAID. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Next message: [Beowulf] Big storage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
