[Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
greg.lindahl at qlogic.com greg.lindahl at qlogic.comWed Apr 18 11:14:22 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:49:08PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: > suggesting that your competitors are stupid or ignorant is _not_ good PR. Yeah, this causes me to hold my tongue on a regular basis ;-) I think Gil must have missed my email a while ago showing slides that prove InfiniPath's cpu overhead is lower than Mellanox for smallish MPI messages. It's well known that offload is often bad for small messages; InfiniBand is not an exception to this rule. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Next message: [Beowulf] 1.2 us IB latency?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list