[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Rusty Lusk lusk at mcs.anl.govThu Apr 12 09:27:28 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sorry for the belated participation in this subthread of this most excellent thread. There is another paper on the relationship between MPI and PVM, written by Bill Gropp and me. You can find it at http://www.mcs.anl.gov/~gropp/bib/papers/2002/mpiandpvm.pdf We wrote it because we felt the story from the "PVM side" (the paper below) was incomplete. On Apr 10, 2007, at 11:37 PM, Robert G. Brown wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Mark Hahn wrote: > >>> It was PVM that enabled true message passing parallel code to be >>> written >>> that made a pile of machines (be they Alphas, simple PCs, Sun >> >> I'm not disagreeing, but wonder why PVM is basically extinct now. >> that is, why was MPI considered an improvement/replacement? > > > As of last year, there were still quite a lot of papers on PVM. I > think > PVM is still widely used in Europe, and a lot of "old hand" cluster > people, myself included still prefer it (given their druthers). It is > much more a part of the ORIGINAL beowulfs and related linux clusters > than MPI. > > MPI had a completely distinct history: > > www.csm.ornl.gov/pvm/PVMvsMPI.ps > > > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
