[Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comTue Apr 10 08:42:51 PDT 2007
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Geoff Jacobs wrote: > Joe Landman wrote: > <snip> >> FWIW2: (and not a sun shill here) Studio 11 is *free*. Doesn't seem to >> generate as good (e.g. fast) code for linux as its commercial >> competitors under linux (nor for that matter is the code it generates >> under Solaris as fast as the code other compilers generate under Linux, >> at least for my test cases) > How comprehensive is the implementation of each element of Forte 11 (esp > FORTRAN)? Don't know, haven't used it extensively for codes. Tried their C/C++ compiler. Took quite a bit of effort to get it to work with the autoconf/gnu toolchain. Almost gave up (e.g. it wasn't worth the effort anyway). GCC gave about the same performance in some cases, and about 20% less in others. -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 or +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Next message: [Beowulf] Win64 Clusters!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
