[Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Geoff Jacobs gdjacobs at gmail.comMon Nov 20 22:04:14 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Next message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark Hahn wrote: >> While looking for the motherboards for our 8-12 dual-core-nodes cluster, > > with a quite small cluster, minor differences in the nic are probably > going to be imperceptible. remember that gigabit > latencies are multiple hundreds of thousands of cpu cycles, > so if it's practical to use at all, you must be using it extremely > infrequently... > >> This motherboard uses the nForce 570 MCP chipset from NVidia, and the >> dual >> lan bythe Vitesse VSC8601. > > that's the phy, not the nic. I think this chipset contains the MCP55 > nic, which is pretty well-established, I think. I don't know if anyone > has done an in-depth comparison of it vs others for perf or overhead. Does anyone have bandwidth and CPU utilization tips for PCI and PCIe busses on enthusiast motherboards? What chipsets perform well? What chipsets do not? -- Geoffrey D. Jacobs Go to the Chinese Restaurant, Order the Special
- Previous message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Next message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
