[Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jones de Andrade johannesrs at gmail.comTue Nov 14 12:46:57 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Next message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all. First of all, thanks a lot for all the answers. They clarified this subject to me. Anyway, since this seems to be a good (AND cheap) solution in many cases, I decided to ask a bit more in detail: While looking for the motherboards for our 8-12 dual-core-nodes cluster, already with the idea of using on-board dual-Gb ethernets on it, we came across the MSI K9N Ultra and bigger ones family. In this family, there is the MSI K9N Platinum ( http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=730), which is appearing around here at a really affordable price (a bit more than 2 hundred dollars each here). This motherboard uses the nForce 570 MCP chipset from NVidia, and the dual lan bythe Vitesse VSC8601. Here is where our concerns now are held: Basically, is this a good dual Gb lan, good in terms of clustering applications? Has anybody ever used it before, or heard about someone using? Or shall we step back about this specific chip/motherboard? Any help on this subject will be very welcome. Thanks a lot, Jones On 11/14/06, Robin Harker < robin at workstationsuk.co.uk> wrote: > > ON-board NICS are as good as PCI, so as long as they are Intel or Broadcom > > don't even think about not using them. AS far as switches are concerned, > ignore all layer 3 devices, as you will never use the functionality and go > for a cheap as chips layer 2, (non-blocking) from a manufacturer you have > heard off, eg: HP, D-Link, SMC or Netgear. If you plan to expand beyong > 24 > or 48 ports, most now do switches with 10GigE uplinks. > > Regards > > R > > Robin Harker > www.terrascale.com > Tel: 01494 724498 > Cell: 07802 517059 > TerraGrid - High Performance Storage - One Brick at a Time > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On > Behalf Of Jones de Andrade > Sent: 14 November 2006 13:26 > To: beowulf at beowulf.org > Subject: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression? > > Hi all. > > Well, I've found some discussions within this list about brands of > switches, > and some about network card brands also. > > We came to a question here, in the cluster we are planning: how usefull > are > the, now so common, onboard gigabit networks (even dual networks) that are > shipped in the motherboards? Great, bood, bad or terrible performance? > stability issues? Much concern about it's use for clusters? Is there any > example, or benchmark available of different onboard network chips in any > (cluster?) application? > > Thanks a lot in advance, > > Sincerally yours, > > Jones > _______________________________________________ > Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org > To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit > http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20061114/d07d2d1a/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Next message: [Beowulf] onboard Gb lan: any opinion, sugestion or impression?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
