[Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Michael Will mwill at penguincomputing.comThu Nov 9 08:37:51 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Core 2 Duo Bugs: Any importance in the beowulf field?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Completely usel.ess unless you plan to litigate and have to prove authorship -----Original Message----- From: Chris Samuel [mailto:csamuel at vpac.org] Sent: Wed Nov 08 19:20:28 2006 To: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday On Thursday 09 February 2006 11:28, Bill Broadley wrote: > I'd vote for banning ALL posts with attachments, HTML, vcard, .exe. > > Has there ever been a useful attachment sent to the beowulf list? PGP signatures.. -- Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/ Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20061109/528e6b63/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Core 2 Duo Bugs: Any importance in the beowulf field?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Apologies for the spam/virus yesterday
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list