[Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] Cell in HPC]
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl greg.lindahl at qlogic.comTue May 30 13:44:39 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] Cell in HPC]
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] Cell in HPC]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:12:28AM -0500, Richard Walsh wrote: > 2. Three tiered memory system with simple local memory (store, > like old Cray-2) that is user/software managed is preferable to > cache in the above context. Double buffering and prefetching to > local store reduce memory delays dramatically. I wouldn't make this comparison. The Cray 2 local store was much easier to use than Cell's software-managed memory. And almost no one actually used the Cray 2 local store. Which ought to be a lesson learned. Another example of a modern machine with software-managed local store is QCDOC. Again, this is the easy-to-use kind, very unlike Cell. -- greg
- Previous message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] Cell in HPC]
- Next message: [Fwd: Re: [Beowulf] Cell in HPC]
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
