[Beowulf] fast interconnects
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Patrick Geoffray patrick at myri.comThu May 25 22:58:46 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Gilad, Gilad Shainer wrote: >>a) There's likely to be 10Gbps ethernet over ordinary cat 5e/6 cabling > > soon. (Solarflare is one company working on it) > > It is not a surprise, as you can run InfiniBand on cat 6 cables today. > There are several solution in the market that make it happened. You can run anything on a shoe string between two yogurt cups today, but it does not mean it's a good idea :-) All Cat6 solutions have the same problems: * overhead: KeyEye's transceivers for 10GigE (KX1001) adds 150ns. That's 0.3us for a point-to-point link if you assume it's per chip, twice that with a switch in between. The transceiver for IB-SDR (KX1003) adds 200ns, that's 0.4 us per link, 0.8 us with one hop. * power: between 3.5 and 3.7 watts per chip. That's more than the rest of the NIC consumption. On a 256-port switch, that's almost an extra 1KW to cool. * length: 25-30 meters, not much more than CX4. Granted, it would certainly be a bit thinner than a 20 meters "firehose" CX4 cable, but it does not help on the length side. The only advantages I see are price of the cable (to be confirmed) and look-like-cat5 warm feelings. Both are very important, but not for technical reasons. Patrick
- Previous message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
