[Beowulf] fast interconnects
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govTue May 23 04:15:40 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 09:21 PM 5/22/2006, Mark Hahn wrote: > > 10GigE people need to solve problems that do not exist in IB, and the > > 10GigE solutions for those issues will results in more expensive NICs. > >but it's silly to only focus on nic prices. I fully expect a myrinet >10gbase-t nic to cost at least around $500. that sounds like a lot more >than a memfree IB nic, but if IB switch ports cost more than 10gbase-t >ports, it may be irrelevant. besides, I'd actually prefer to pay a bit >more for my nics - to put intelligence in the nic rather than the switch. There's sort of three problems that need to be solved for really fast links: 1) The actual transport over the wire. To get the high speeds, you'll need intelligence on both ends of the wire (adaptive EQ and coding), so I would expect that would drive costs on both the NIC and switch end, roughly equally (unless there's some sort of subsidization going on) 2) Actually getting data out of the PC into the wire at 10 Gbps is no trivial matter. 66 Megatransfers per second at 32 bits/transfer is only 2 Gbps. I suspect that systems that can make effective use of these sorts of rates will NOT be based on "cards that plug into a backplane". 3) Then, there's the switch. If it's a *switch* that sets up circuits, then it can be fairly inexpensive. If it's something that has to do packet buffering, it gets a lot more expensive. Jim
- Previous message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
