[Beowulf] fast interconnects
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caMon May 22 21:21:45 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > - isn't Mellanox still the sole source for IB chips, for both > > nics and switches? this seems odd if it's a thriving ecosystem. > > no offense intended! yes, I know quadrics/SGI/SCI/Myri are all > > also sole-source. but compared to the eth world... > > Mellanox is not the sole source for InfiniBand chips. There are other > vendors like Qlogic and IBM that have InfiniBand chips. As InfiniBand hmm, I know various people have produced IB chips, but I haven't seen any in actual use. oh, wait, qlogic - you mean pathscale infinipath. yes, certainly, though it's worth noting that the interesting part of their product specifically just hijacks IB for their own faster MPI protocol ;) not unlike octigabay/cray-xd1, come to think of it, and not really _that_ far from the Horus folk using IB phy layers for their non-IB fabric. > > - price of nics has gone down significantly, close to the point > > of no resistance. but afaikt, IB switching is still a big cost; > > are there prospects of IB switch fabrics getting anywhere close > > to gigabit costs? > > Its all customers demand. The market pushes the price down and we see > the results already. Mellanox ASIC is $69 and adapter is $125 OEM price. what puzzles me is that market-push-down has apparenly only driven the prices of nics down. that's a bit silly, since surely shaving $10 of memory off a $100 nic hurts performance, especially when the majority of the installation's cost is in switch+cable (at least 5x the nic cost, no?) > > - IB people seem to be claiming quite nice latency figures > > these days, but I don't really understand what changed to cause > > a ~7x reduction in latency. > > In one word experience. In the early days, IB was not design for high > performance but for other reasons. But if you can get high BW and low > latency then why not... Mellanox increases the performance from > generation to generation, and the latency we see today from multiple > vendors are quite nice figures.. I'm afraid that upon reading this response and thinking about it, I know no more than before ;( > 10GigE people need to solve problems that do not exist in IB, and the > 10GigE solutions for those issues will results in more expensive NICs. but it's silly to only focus on nic prices. I fully expect a myrinet 10gbase-t nic to cost at least around $500. that sounds like a lot more than a memfree IB nic, but if IB switch ports cost more than 10gbase-t ports, it may be irrelevant. besides, I'd actually prefer to pay a bit more for my nics - to put intelligence in the nic rather than the switch.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Next message: [Beowulf] fast interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
