[Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comWed May 17 15:57:38 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Next message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 06:17:43PM -0400, Mark Hahn wrote: > incidentally what leads you to think you should be using memory locking? The kernel.org people are insisting that kernel modules in the kernel enforce the limit, so the default has to be raised for everyone using OpenIB and InfiniPath software. The locked memory in this instance is the memory being used for RDMA and other DMA purposes. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Next message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list