[Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caWed May 17 15:17:43 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Next message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> So I submit a job, through Torque, and I simply execute a "ulimit -l" > only to find that my limit is set to the original value, 32. Using a inherited from the process that started your process, probably. try restarting relevant scheduler daemons - it matters when they started up relative to your limits.conf changes. incidentally what leads you to think you should be using memory locking? it's generally a very bad idea, since, like running in RT scheduling priorities, you're preventing the kernel's normal balancing...
- Previous message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Next message: [Beowulf] /etc/security/limits.conf and Torque jobs
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
