[Beowulf] split traffic to two interfaces for two "subnets"
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Sean Dilda sean at duke.eduThu May 11 06:29:42 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] split traffic to two interfaces for two "subnets"
- Next message: [Beowulf] split traffic to two interfaces for two "subnets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > I have 25 nodes all on 10.0.0.0/24 network, new file-server (lets call > it raider) has 2 gigabit ports. I would like to spread the I/O load so > that > > 10.0.0.16/28 goes through eth1 > the rest 10.0.0.0/24 can go through eth0 (as before) Instead of trying to put certain nodes on eth0 and certain nodes on eth1, have you considered bonding eth0 and eth1 together and letting traffic be spread across them like that? It should automatically balance traffic for you. Plus, if an ethernet port or cable does on the storage server when the ports are bonded, all your nodes can still get to NFS.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] split traffic to two interfaces for two "subnets"
- Next message: [Beowulf] split traffic to two interfaces for two "subnets"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
