[Beowulf] Bonding Ethernet cards / [was] 512 nodes Myrinet cluster Challenges
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comWed May 10 01:11:43 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Bonding Ethernet cards / [was] 512 nodes Myrinet cluster Challenges
- Next message: [Beowulf] Bonding Ethernet cards / [was] 512 nodes Myrinet cluster Challenges
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 03:38 +0100, Krugger wrote: > Would it not be better to split the networks physically. I mean one > network( + routers) for the NFS (basically for remote IO) and the > other network(+ routers) for the interprocess comunications > s This is a very common configuration for our clusters. Most motherboards these days come with dual on-board gigabit. One is used for general cluster traffic and NFS. the other is dedicated to MPI traffic, using a separate switch or stack of switches. (The normal MPI implementation is the low-latency SCore) On machines with separate service processors (for example Sun Galaxy) we put in Netgear 10/100 switches and cabling for a management network. With Serial Over LAN we don't have any need for serial console cabling any more.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Bonding Ethernet cards / [was] 512 nodes Myrinet cluster Challenges
- Next message: [Beowulf] Bonding Ethernet cards / [was] 512 nodes Myrinet cluster Challenges
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
