[Beowulf] shared memory versus MPI and bootless boot
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
pauln pauln at psc.eduThu Jun 29 09:44:52 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] shared memory versus MPI and bootless boot
- Next message: [Beowulf] shared memory versus MPI and bootless boot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I think the gzip'ed image is about 24MB and you don't have to access /dev over nfs. paul Mark Hahn wrote: >>>if your ram disk or local storage is 128MB, over a 2Mbps connect, i make >>>it 8 mins, nearer 9 to load which is... urm slow. >>> >>>again this for a 100Mbps hub you would get 10.24 seconds per node. >>> >>> >>Ah thanks for noticing this, hadn't realized this timing problem yet! >> >> > >well, 128M of traffic to boot is pretty extreme. I haven't tcpdumped it, >but it looks like around 2-4MB is all that's needed using the NFS-root approach. > >_______________________________________________ >Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf > >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] shared memory versus MPI and bootless boot
- Next message: [Beowulf] shared memory versus MPI and bootless boot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
