[Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
laytonjb at charter.net laytonjb at charter.netFri Jun 16 13:08:54 PDT 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
---- Geoff Jacobs <gdjacobs at gmail.com> wrote: > laytonjb at charter.net wrote: > <snip> > > - The network/MPI combination is fairly critical to good performance and to > > price/performance. I have done some benchmarks where the right MPI library > > on GigE produces faster results than a bad MPI library on Myrinet. Seems > > counter-intuitive, but I've seen it. > > - The MPI is pretty important to good performance particularly on GigE. One > > benchmark I did showed over a 2X in performance on LAM compared to > > MPICH1. I know MPICH1 is really old and we have a shiny new MPICH2, but > > you would be suprised how many people start with MPICH1 and how many > > people stick with it. > Do you have some anecdotal numbers for different MPI libraries over GigE? Sure. This is for one specific CFD code. Let's assum that MPICH 1 is the basline. MPICH2 was twice as fast (half the run time). LAM was 30% faster than MPICH2. Scali MPI Connect was 20% faster than LAM. Altogether, Scali MPI Connect was twice as fast as MPICH1. Is this what you were looking for? Jeff
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Next message: [Beowulf] Slection from processor choices; Requesting Giudence
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
