[Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comSun Jan 29 22:54:50 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:18:22AM -0500, Mark Hahn wrote: > hmm, I had the impression that InfiniPath operated in either fast > InfiniPath-to-InfiniPath mode, or in slow generic IB mode. that is, > that in "fast" mode, it was mostly just recycling IB phy layers. Our fast mode is the moral equivalent to sending packets with unusual ethertypes over Ethernet. That's still Ethernet; the standard allows for such an extension. IB is similarly extensible. The Cray XT3 is an example, I think, of a system which sends non-IB-like packets over an IB physical layer. But I don't think the details are public and I don't know much about the XT3. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
