[Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comSun Jan 29 21:18:11 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 04:28:54PM -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote: > Is there a way of characterizing in what proportion a given application > relies on OpenMP, and how much the application depends on MPI (and hence > MPI network latency) - other than speaking with application developers > to get their intuitive feel, that is? :) If you don't want to spend an unfortunate amount of time learning tools (alas, I wish they were easier to use), your best bet is to run on gigE and on some better cluster interconnect and see how it turns out. PathScale has 2 16-node clusters we provide remote access to for such testing. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
