[Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
John Hearns john.hearns at streamline-computing.comThu Jan 26 14:06:31 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 18:56 +0000, Ricardo Reis wrote: > Hi > > I've looked around, in the list and google and didn't find anything > elucidating enough on this so mabe someone could englight me or point me > where to look. > We ship quite a few clusters configured like this. One gigabit switch handles the 'housekeeping' and NFS traffic. The other switch handles the MPI traffic. As Douglas says, most motherboards come with two gigabit interfaces these days, so you need a second set of cabling and a second set of switches. In our case, the SCore environment uses MAC addresses, so there's no need to configure separate hostnames.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
