[Beowulf] Supermicro H8SSL-R10 versus H8SSL-i motherboards,, Broadcom SATA chips
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bruce Allen ballen at gravity.phys.uwm.eduThu Jan 26 07:04:33 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Supermicro H8SSL-R10 versus H8SSL-i motherboards,, Broadcom SATA chips
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Mark Hahn wrote: > (in the absence of windows, there's no reason to use builtin fraid over > MD.) I'm not sure about this. I had the impression that the 'builtin fraid' on this system has Linux support from Broadcom, including both some OS drivers and user-side tools (CLI and GUI). But I could be wrong. Can anyone confirm or deny? Cheers, Bruce
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Supermicro H8SSL-R10 versus H8SSL-i motherboards,, Broadcom SATA chips
- Next message: [Beowulf] using two separate networks for different data streams
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list