[Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Kozin, I (Igor) i.kozin at dl.ac.ukTue Jan 24 02:54:32 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
- Next message: [Beowulf] ECC settings for Opteron 175 + Serverworks HT1000 chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > > > > A is trivial. > > B is less trivial to most, but consider this. I bought a dual core > > opteron 2.4Ghz, > > under windows visual c++ 2005 professional edition is 10% > faster as it > > seems now > > than any compiler is under *nix. > > Does '/any/ compiler under unix' include Pathscale, PGI and Intel. Did > you also verify Intel on windows? Most likely he is talking about integer performance and the statement could be true. Look at spec int 2000.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
- Next message: [Beowulf] ECC settings for Opteron 175 + Serverworks HT1000 chipset
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list