[Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Toon Knapen toon.knapen at fft.beMon Jan 23 22:21:22 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > A is trivial. > B is less trivial to most, but consider this. I bought a dual core > opteron 2.4Ghz, > under windows visual c++ 2005 professional edition is 10% faster as it > seems now > than any compiler is under *nix. Does '/any/ compiler under unix' include Pathscale, PGI and Intel. Did you also verify Intel on windows?
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Q&A: BeOS and IBM Cell processor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list