[Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Joe Landman landman at scalableinformatics.comSat Dec 9 05:58:55 PST 2006
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Guy Coates wrote: > > At what node count does the nfs-root model start to break down? Does anyone > have any rough numbers with the number of clients you can support with a generic > linux NFS server vs a dedicated NAS filer? If you use warewulf or the new perceus variant, it creates a ram disk which is populated upon boot. Thats one of the larger transients. Then you nfs mount applications, and home directories. I haven't looked at Scyld for a while, but I seem to remember them doing something like this. If you have this operational in this manner, apart from home/scratch directory file service, you should be able to handle a few hundred nodes without too much pain, though you will want to beef up the design a bit. Scyld requires a meatier head node as I remember due to its launch model. Even better if you can load balance your NFS servers and set them up to mirror each other, or use a hardware unit like Panasas, and so on. Joe > > Cheers, > > Guy > -- Joseph Landman, Ph.D Founder and CEO Scalable Informatics LLC, email: landman at scalableinformatics.com web : http://www.scalableinformatics.com phone: +1 734 786 8423 fax : +1 734 786 8452 or +1 866 888 3112 cell : +1 734 612 4615
- Previous message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Next message: [Beowulf] SATA II - PXE+NFS - diskless compute nodes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
