[Beowulf] iptaled
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Leif Nixon nixon at nsc.liu.seFri Sep 30 02:55:11 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] iptaled
- Next message: [Beowulf] hpl size problems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe Landman <landman at scalableinformatics.com> writes: > Putting each node in your cluster on the public net, significantly > increases your security perimeter, increases the amount of monitoring > you need to do, and should generally keep you awake at night. Even > with IPtables and other tools, you are still more exposed than not. > > There may be a set of perfectly valid reasons to do this, but in the > end you have to balance security (reducing exposure points to a > controllable few) versus functionality. There is a school of thought that claims a firewall is a security SPOF, that it creates a false sense of security and encourages laziness in keeping your systems patched, and that firewalls are, in fact, evil and only should be used in the rarest of circumstances. I don't fully agree, but I've been involved in enough heated arguments with proponents of that view that I have come to respect some of their arguments. -- Leif Nixon - Systems expert ------------------------------------------------------------ National Supercomputer Centre - Linkoping University ------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message: [Beowulf] iptaled
- Next message: [Beowulf] hpl size problems
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
