[Beowulf] Re: Povray + MPI (award@andorra.ad)
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
David Mathog mathog at mendel.bio.caltech.eduTue Sep 20 13:40:45 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster advice
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Povray + MPI, Barcelona Supercomputing Center
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> From: award at andorra.ad > > Could anybody give me a pointer to either a compatible MPI Patch + Povray > source, or a compiled version for RedHat 9 + Gcc 3.2.2 ? Any >= 3.0 > version would be fine. This probably isn't what you want to hear, but if you N nodes and M rendering jobs it will run faster if you just distribute those M normal Povray jobs across those N nodes (with the queue system of your choice) than if you build an MPI or PVM version of POVRAY and then run the M jobs sequentially through that program. At least that's the way it was when I last looked at it several years ago. This is true so long as you DON'T have the remote jobs writing povray output continuously back to your NFS server. It works better to direct to /tmp and then copy in one fell swoop back to the final central directory. Regards, David Mathog mathog at caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech
- Previous message: [Beowulf] cluster advice
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Povray + MPI, Barcelona Supercomputing Center
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
