[Beowulf] Parallel memory
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Bogdan Costescu Bogdan.Costescu at iwr.uni-heidelberg.deWed Oct 19 02:53:10 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Parallel memory
- Next message: [Beowulf] Parallel memory
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005, Robert G. Brown wrote: > There was once also an online list discussion about swapping to an > NFS mounted remote exported ramdisk There are some problems with this approach, which is in principle very similar with swapping over NBD or iSCSI. A discussion about iSCSI just happened 1-2 months ago on the netdev and linux-kernel mailing lists; the main problem is what to do in case the memory becomes tight: a part of memory has to be sent to the block device, but sending it requires allocating more memory for the network transfer; sometimes some part of memory is sent out just so that another part is copied back in, in which case more memory is needed for the network transfer (for the reception) - both these situations can result in a deadlock. So, swapping over network is not (yet) that reliable - doing this at the application level, therefore knowing more-or-less the pattern of transfers, seems much wiser. -- Bogdan Costescu IWR - Interdisziplinaeres Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftliches Rechnen Universitaet Heidelberg, INF 368, D-69120 Heidelberg, GERMANY Telephone: +49 6221 54 8869, Telefax: +49 6221 54 8868 E-mail: Bogdan.Costescu at IWR.Uni-Heidelberg.De
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Parallel memory
- Next message: [Beowulf] Parallel memory
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
