[Beowulf] MPI ABI
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caMon Oct 10 10:51:38 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] MPI ABI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> There are only 2 ways to achieve ABI compatibility: > 1) you impose/agree on a single one. ignoring the politics for a moment, what are the technical sticking points? for instance, I have the impression that the linux x86_64 ABI is reasonably well-defined, and it seems to permit use of at least some libraries across different compilers in my experience. so what are the problem areas? just that the MPI Forum has chosen/failed to define constants and proper opaque types? thanks, mark hahn.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] MPI ABI
- Next message: [Beowulf] MPI ABI
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
