[Beowulf] hpl size problems
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Chris Samuel csamuel at vpac.orgTue Oct 4 00:07:31 PDT 2005
- Previous message: Application certification (was Re: [Beowulf] hpl size problems)
- Next message: Application certification (was Re: [Beowulf] hpl size problems)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 01:22 am, Robert G. Brown wrote: > And if either of you, or the bioperl maintainers, had done a central > perl build into well-structured rpms, the other one wouldn't have to to > have done their own build into /usr/local. Right? If their RPMs had chosen the same set of Bioperl optional dependencies that we needed, and backported it to Redhat 7.3, then maybe it might work. We don't have the time to try and work that out for a Byzantine system like BioPerl. Chris -- Christopher Samuel - (03)9925 4751 - VPAC Deputy Systems Manager Victorian Partnership for Advanced Computing http://www.vpac.org/ Bldg 91, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton South, VIC 3053, Australia -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20051004/c39739a0/attachment.bin
- Previous message: Application certification (was Re: [Beowulf] hpl size problems)
- Next message: Application certification (was Re: [Beowulf] hpl size problems)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
