[Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Imran Khan Imran at workstationsuk.co.ukTue Nov 15 05:48:09 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Arvind, I think you should try some thing like Terragrid, Terragrid uses a cache coherent implementation of iSCSI, to make a standard Linux filesystem behave as a parallel filesystem. The advantages this brings are: 1. Standard Linux filesystem, and tools, so no re-training 2. Small code base of only 40,000 lines of c, which means easy to support software 3. Unlike, PVFS, GFS, Lustre etc, TerraGrid does not use a Meta Data Controller, so scales linearly. 4. TerraGrid is the only CFS solution with a 24X7 resilient option! 5. "Terrabrick", allows you to start with one brick and expand as you need to. 6. Increased reliability by support for diskless cluster nodes Regards Imran _____ From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On Behalf Of ar 3107 Sent: 10 November 2005 05:36 To: beowulf at beowulf.org Subject: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver We are looking into designing a low cost, high performance storage system. Requirements as below: - Starts at 3TB, should scale up by adding more servers to say 10-12TB - Use commodity technologies (x86_64, IB, GE, Linux), preferably all OSS components - Provide high I/O which scales with addition of storage nodes. - To be used for hosting user home dirs so reliability is important - The HPC cluster starts with 6 AMD64 nodes and is expected to scale to 1000+nodes in a year. - Preferably without FC/SAN We do have experience with IBM GPFS, PVFS (1,2), NetApps, PolyServe but not with GFS and LUSTRE. PVFS is not reliable enough for home dirs (OK for scratch), GPFS cannot do RAID5 like striping across nodes, needs SAN for RAID1 like mirroring (cost $$$) , polyserve is too expensive (per CPU pricing) Is GFS or Lustre suitable for the above needs? Any other commercial slution? I would like to know the experiences and suggestions from the advanced users on this list. Regards, Arvind -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.scyld.com/pipermail/beowulf/attachments/20051115/43ad09a0/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Next message: [Beowulf] Question on hgh performance, low cost Fileserver
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
