Archives


- Beowulf
- Beowulf Announce
- Scyld-users
- Beowulf on Debian

[Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster

Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.

Search

Tajendra Singh tvsingh at ucla.edu
Mon May 16 11:58:54 PDT 2005


Thanks to all who responded.
Regards,

TV 


On 5/16/05 7:00 AM, "Mark Hahn" <hahn at physics.mcmaster.ca> wrote:

>> We have implemented clusters using one interface for parallel traffic
>> (Score) and one for general purpose/NFS traffic.
> 
> segregating traffic is a common suggestion, but I don't really understand
> why it would be sensible.  a node is unlikley to be running some mixture
> of MPI and IO jobs, at least the normal kind of node (dual).
> control/monitoring really ought to be minimal in bandwidth (per-node), no?
> 
> failing to use both ports seems like a shame to me - host ports are
> smarter than switch ports, and let you build extremely high bisection
> networks.  for instance:
> 
> - NxM grid of nodes.
> - each N nodes across plugs into the m-th "row" switch.
> - each M nodes down plugs into the n-th "column" switch.
> - each switch plugs into its peers: the m-th row switch
> plugs into M-1 other row switches.
> 
> each route is 1-2 switch hops; nodes only do the initial bit of routing
> (which port to use).  this mainly makes sense where you have cheap switches,
> but more nodes than FNN can use (and biger switches are expensive.)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org
> To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit
> http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf





More information about the Beowulf mailing list