[Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Mark Hahn hahn at physics.mcmaster.caMon May 16 07:00:48 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> We have implemented clusters using one interface for parallel traffic > (Score) and one for general purpose/NFS traffic. segregating traffic is a common suggestion, but I don't really understand why it would be sensible. a node is unlikley to be running some mixture of MPI and IO jobs, at least the normal kind of node (dual). control/monitoring really ought to be minimal in bandwidth (per-node), no? failing to use both ports seems like a shame to me - host ports are smarter than switch ports, and let you build extremely high bisection networks. for instance: - NxM grid of nodes. - each N nodes across plugs into the m-th "row" switch. - each M nodes down plugs into the n-th "column" switch. - each switch plugs into its peers: the m-th row switch plugs into M-1 other row switches. each route is 1-2 switch hops; nodes only do the initial bit of routing (which port to use). this mainly makes sense where you have cheap switches, but more nodes than FNN can use (and biger switches are expensive.)
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
