[Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.comSun May 15 20:13:03 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
My own experience has not been positive. I fiddled with route tables, statically routing IP's out different interfaces etc... and then ran some bandwidth tests. The net result was that I got around 12% extra out of the 2nd NIC and no noticeable performance gain on any applications. Most desktop/low end systems struggle to push both nics hard... so it just wasn't worth it. Stu. On 14/05/2005, at 4:10, Tajendra Singh wrote: > Greetings!! > > Many of the vendors are providing two GigE ports by default on > systems which > are being used as nodes in beowulf types of clusters. > > Is there anybody who tried connecting both the ports to the switch? > I know > LA-MPI ( http://public.lanl.gov/lampi/) talks about utilizing multiple > network devices in real time, but did not get chance to experiment > with it. > I would like to hear your opinion whether it makes sense, looking > at the > lower costs per port for GigE switches? > > Thanks in advance, > > TV Singh > HPC Applications, ATS/UCLA > -- Dr Stuart Midgley sdm900 at gmail.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Next message: [Beowulf] Experience of using multiple network devices on a node in cluster
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
