[Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Lombard, David N david.n.lombard at intel.comTue May 10 15:51:55 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
From: Jim Lux on Tuesday, May 10, 2005 3:45 PM > > At 03:37 PM 5/10/2005, Lombard, David N wrote: > >Hmm, too "big" or "flimsy" have very precise definition based on exactly > >the measures you describe. Such goal functions have been in use in the > >various structural optimizers for years now, e.g., weight, stress > >distributions, deflections, modal responses, &etc. > > > True, when you have hard specifications. The hard part is negotiating a > relative weight for each of these factors when doing the tradeoff, as is > often the case in early trade studies. > > That's where the "skilled evaluator" comes in. A person with some years > of > experience can integrate all those different factors fairly easily. Fair comment, preliminary design has always been a tough analysis area. -- David N. Lombard My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: Beowulf Digest, Vol 15, Issue 16
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
