[Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Steffen Persvold sp at scali.comThu May 5 07:42:49 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org [mailto:beowulf-bounces at beowulf.org] On > Behalf Of Andrew Piskorski > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:15 AM > To: beowulf > Subject: Re: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops > > On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:14:42PM +0200, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > > Those bottlenecks are derived because they use 1000s of chickens. > > Vincent, however expert you might be in your own field, you clearly > have no real idea what you're talking about in this one, and I suspect > all you've accomplished in this thread is convincing 90+% of the list > readers to simply ignore your posts as a waste of their time. I find them actually really funny to read, not especially technically enlightening, but really funny. Maybe I've got too much spare time on my hands, or a weird sense of humor ;) -S-
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
