[Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Douglas Eadline - ClusterWorld Magazine deadline at clusterworld.comThu May 5 09:32:19 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] standards for GFLOPS / power consumption measurement?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Latency dependant software
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Phil I find your statements and conclusions so out of context that I cannot respond in a meaningful way. -Doug On Wed, 4 May 2005, Philippe Blaise wrote: > Douglas Eadline - ClusterWorld Magazine wrote: > > >On Tue, 3 May 2005, Philippe Blaise wrote: > > > > > > > >>Robert G. Brown wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>.... > >>> > >>>Still, the marketplace speaks for itself. It doesn't argue, and isn't > >>>legendary, it just is. > >>>.... > >>> > >>> > >>But, does the hpc marketplace have a direction ? > >> > >> > > > >Just as any market place it is ruled by price/performance. One could argue > >that during the "vector machine" epoch there was an artificial market that > >was due to the cold war. Performance at any price was an important > >strategic issue. > > > > > > > You really think, that even today, the market place is ruled by price / > performance ratio ? > So why don't we use millions of slow and cheap cpus ? > With this kind of argument we must stop the research programs, and try > to transform all the > scientific codes for embarrisingly parallel computing ! > > More seriously, the market place seems mostly governed by big US > companies and > financial directors. > Moreover, remember that some years ago NEC and Fujitsu supercomputers > have been > taxed by the US government. (and that was not during the cold war !). > See for example > http://www.freetrade.org/pubs/articles/cd-supercomputer.html > > Today everyone should be happy to see that some companies like Cray > are trying to do better than HP or IBM in the linux cluster area, event > it if it's not > the Cray of yesterday as you said. > I think that this is partially due to the "NEC earth simulator effect", > and that linux clusters > performances and functionalities are not fantastic for parallel jobs > compare to a good old T3E. > > The price/perf ratio is too simplistic. > The marketplace at a given instant means nothing. > > > Phil. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Editor-in-chief ClusterWorld Magazine Desk: 610.865.6061 Cell: 610.390.7765 Redefining High Performance Computing Fax: 610.865.6618 www.clusterworld.com
- Previous message: [Beowulf] standards for GFLOPS / power consumption measurement?
- Next message: [Beowulf] Latency dependant software
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
