[Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Andrew Piskorski atp at piskorski.comThu May 5 03:14:38 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:14:42PM +0200, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > Those bottlenecks are derived because they use 1000s of chickens. Vincent, however expert you might be in your own field, you clearly have no real idea what you're talking about in this one, and I suspect all you've accomplished in this thread is convincing 90+% of the list readers to simply ignore your posts as a waste of their time. I recommend reading more and talking less. Especially when folks like RGB and Greg Lindahl have already pointed this out to you in Not So Subtle terms. -- Andrew Piskorski <atp at piskorski.com> http://www.piskorski.com/
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list