[Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Greg Lindahl lindahl at pathscale.comWed May 4 12:54:17 PDT 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:03:51PM -0400, Robert G. Brown wrote: > Do compilers > automatically use block prefetch and three phase implementations of the > floating point involved? I can't speak for other compilers, but we don't do block prefetch and three phase loops, we do straight prefetch, and it works quite well. It can be hard to stare at a paper advocating some particular technique and understand if it actually beats the conventional method of doing something; I have no idea why the conventional method works so poorly for him, but our current STREAM numbers are equal to his fancy method without all the pain. -- greg
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: vectors vs. loops
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
