[Beowulf] Re: The move to gigabit - technical questions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Fringe Dweller steve_heaton at ozemail.com.auSat Mar 19 19:59:45 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Gigabit Switch
- Next message: [Beowulf] Questions regarding interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> When he said "vanilla", I believe he meant, "Using > the stock Linux driver settngs with no attempt at tuning for the needs > of my particular HPC application." Indeed :) > Since he is using Intel Pro/1000 cards, he probably should also try > using GAMMA rather than TCP/IP. > Yep, the kind of tweak that Peter Kjellström has proposed (InterruptThrottleRate=0) is still on the cards. As is the investigation of GAMMA. Two for two Andrew ;) There's also sand pit time for the relevance of jumbo packets, falcON et al style Nbody hierarchy methodologies etc etc. I'll be documenting as I go for anyone interested to follow. Generally Nbody code seems to push the net hard during the initial data distribution, burns the processors hard on the calcs then the net gets a squeak again when the results are assembled. ...Then when my Fair Godmother turns up with that pile of dual Opertons I'll be ready =) Cheers Steve
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Gigabit Switch
- Next message: [Beowulf] Questions regarding interconnects
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
