[Beowulf] Re: The move to gigabit - technical questions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
steve_heaton at ozemail.com.au steve_heaton at ozemail.com.auWed Mar 16 18:42:56 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Seg Fault with pvm_upkstr() and Linux.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
G'day all Somewhat relevant... Part of my benchtesting exersize on my DIY beowulf was a comparison between running the onboard FastEthernet v's adding an Intel 1000MT GigaE adapter. I changed the MPI config to ensure the MPI traffic had the GigaE to itself and "other" traffic went via the FastE. I ran the full MPI perftest suite. Sample graphs on this web page: http://members.ozemail.com.au/~sheaton/lss/ -> Computing It was indeed "a bit" faster. There's some NetPipe results in there too. I can provide more details if any one is interested. Note: I know magic can be worked with the Intel driver but this is "vanilla" ATM. Cheers Steve This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Seg Fault with pvm_upkstr() and Linux.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Re: The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list