[Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Jim Lux James.P.Lux at jpl.nasa.govWed Mar 16 09:22:29 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Next message: [Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 06:41 AM 3/16/2005, Robert G. Brown wrote: >On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > > > At 05:41 PM 3/14/2005 -0500, Glen Gardner wrote: > > >Gigabit will be a little faster than 100Mbit on a small cluster, but not > > >a lot. > > > > What is 'not a lot'. > > > > I would guess it's factor 10 faster in bandwidth? > >(Maybe, you don't get QUITE 100% of the raw clock advantage in all >applications on all hardware, Vincent;-). However, for most >applications on most hardware you >>should<< get a signficant advantage >-- 80-95% of 10x, or 8-9.5x. Not a just "a little". > One might want to go back through the archives and see what the difference between 10 Mbps and 100 Mbps Ethernet was, and more to the point, why it wasn't 10x faster. While the details might change, the basic issues remain: "wire speed" "protocol overhead" "physical interface to PC's CPU" "drivers" James Lux, P.E. Spacecraft Radio Frequency Subsystems Group Flight Communications Systems Section Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mail Stop 161-213 4800 Oak Grove Drive Pasadena CA 91109 tel: (818)354-2075 fax: (818)393-6875
- Previous message: [Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Next message: [Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
