[Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Vincent Diepeveen diep at xs4all.nlTue Mar 15 12:11:44 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [Bioclusters] Direct connect infiniband/quadrics?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
At 05:41 PM 3/14/2005 -0500, Glen Gardner wrote: >Gigabit will be a little faster than 100Mbit on a small cluster, but not >a lot. What is 'not a lot'. I would guess it's factor 10 faster in bandwidth? >I ended up using 5 cheap gigabit switches to make a gigabit concentrator >for my 12 node cluster. >It eliminated the tendency for the network to saturate under a heavy load. Very interesting, can you post a connection scheme and routing table? >It also let me use gigabit network cards in my I/O node and controlling >node with a small improvement in file I/O. Streaming i/o or random access? cheapo disk arrays get what is it, 400MB/s handsdown or so? that's raid5 readspeed, plenty security at a raid5 array. >The compute nodes remaind with 100 Mbit to conserve power. The setup >works rather nicely. what type of software do you run at it, embarrassingly parallel software? Vincent >Glen > >Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Good evening, >> >>It's interesting to investigate what gigabit can do for small home clusters. >> >>Any latency oriented approach is doomed to fail obviously at gigabit. But >>they're cheap. For 40 euro i see several getting offered already. >> >>First important question is of course how much system time those NIC's eat >>when fully loading their bandwidth. >> >>Example, i have an old dual k7 here with pci 2.2 (32 bits 33Mhz). >>Suppose i put a gigabit card in it. >> >>In say 6 messages a second i ship 8MB data at a time. Ship and send in turn. >> >>So it ships a packet of 8MB, then receives a packet of 8MB. >> >>Other than the cost of the thread to store the packet to RAM, does such a >>card in any way stop or block the cpu's which are 100% loaded with >>searching software (my chessprogram diep in this case)? >> >>What penalty other than that thread handling the message is there in terms >>of system time reduction to the 2 processes searching? >> >>Oh btw, i assume that gigabit can handle 48MB/s user data a second? >> >>Vincent >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Beowulf mailing list, Beowulf at beowulf.org >>To change your subscription (digest mode or unsubscribe) visit http://www.beowulf.org/mailman/listinfo/beowulf >> >> >> > >-- >Glen E. Gardner, Jr. >AA8C >AMSAT MEMBER 10593 >Glen.Gardner at verizon.net > > >http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze24qhw/index.html > > > > >
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Re: [Bioclusters] Direct connect infiniband/quadrics?
- Next message: [Beowulf] The move to gigabit - technical questions
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
