[Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf cluster.
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Omri Schwarz ocschwar at MIT.EDUThu Mar 10 08:13:50 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf cluster.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf cluster.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Joe Landman wrote: > > http://ageia.com > > > > > > While I'm bringing this up, how about things like the MAP > > processor? > > > > http://www.srccomp.com/HardwareElements.htm#MAPProcessor > > Or any others. > > Inverting the question, if you pay 4000$US per dual CPU compute node > (+/- a bit depending upon technology, config, supplier), what price (if > any) would you be willing to pay for an accelerator that offered you an > order of magnitude more performance per node, on your code, and sat in > the PCI-e/X or HTX slots? And also as important: how hard would you be > willing to work/how much effort committed to program these things? This > makes lots of assumptions, such as such a beast existing, your code > being mapped or mappable to it, and you being interested in this. One might presume that if a piece of kit becomes known as attractive to our community there would be a port of BLAS, LAPACK, FFTW and so on written for it in very short order.
- Previous message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf cluster.
- Next message: [Beowulf] Quasi-Non-Von-Neumann hardware in a Beowulf cluster.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
