[Beowulf] looking for a reference on failure rates
Many of your questions may have already been answered in earlier discussions or in the FAQ. The search results page will indicate current discussions as well as past list serves, articles, and papers.
Don Holmgren djholm at fnal.govMon Mar 7 11:59:56 PST 2005
- Previous message: [Beowulf] looking for a reference on failure rates
- Next message: [Beowulf] looking for a reference on failure rates
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Joe Landman wrote: > Hi folks: > > I am looking for a reference which describes failure rates of modern > computer components as a function of temperature. The usual rule of > thumb is that every 10 degrees above a certain value doubles the failure > rate (or decreases lifetime). I would like to look at this analysis and > refer to it for something I am working on. > > Thanks > > Joe > > Joe - Take a look at this Test and Measurement World article for starters: http://www.reed-electronics.com/tmworld/article/CA187523.html The rule of thumb that you mention comes from using an Arrhenius model to describe the relationship between temperature and failure rates. Arrhenius first published this equation (now named after him) in 1889 k(T) = A exp ( -Ea / RT) to explain the variation of reaction rates with temperature of several elementary chemical reactions. Here, k is the reaction rate, A is a constant, Ea is the activation energy for the reaction, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin. It turns out that many semiconductor degradation mechanisms - electromigration, corrosion, defect growth, etc. - fit this relationship well. Note that you'll usually see Boltzmann's constant (another 'k') instead of 'R' in the semiconductor reliability literature. Chemists use R and express Ea in units of kJoule/mole, physicists and engineers tend to use k and express Ea in electron volts. In the reliability literature, you'll often see the Arrhenius model written in term of time to failure, which is proportional to the inverse of the reaction rate. At two different temperatures T1 and T2, the times to failure would be given by t1 = A exp (Ea / kT1) # k = Boltzmann's constant t2 = A exp (Ea / kT2) and so the ratio of lifetimes is given by t1/t2 = exp [ Ea/k * (1/T1 - 1/T2) ] If t1 is room temperature (~ 298K), an activation energy of about 0.54 eV would give a doubling in failure rate at a 10 degree C higher temperature. There's a handy chemist's page at http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/kinetics/faq/temperature-and-reaction-rate.shtml that will let you plug in 3 of the 4 variables (T1, T2, Ea, reaction rate ratio) and it will give you the third. I've got a number of semiconductor reliability texts with tables of Ea versus failure mechanism - I can post the references if you request, though they're a bit dated (15 years old). Ea varies widely in these tables from about 0.3 eV to as high as 2.0 eV. There are even some negative Ea's, corresponding to failure mechanisms that decelerate with increasing temperature. The "factor of 2 with every 10 degrees" is only a very rough rule of thumb. Don Holmgren
- Previous message: [Beowulf] looking for a reference on failure rates
- Next message: [Beowulf] looking for a reference on failure rates
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Beowulf mailing list
